In the news, the International Donor
Conference for Darfur in Doha has attracted delegations from 37 nations, 22 UN
agencies and 60 international and national organizations.
One of the conference objectives is
the Darfur Development Strategy (DDS), a six-year plan of action that emerged
from the 2011 Doha Document for Peace in Darfur (DDPD) and which requires donor
support to move Darfur from humanitarian assistance towards rehabilitation,
sustained development and lasting peace.
The two-day conference which began
on Sunday and finished today was agreed under a July 2011 peace deal the
government signed in the Qatari capital with an alliance of rebel splinter
groups.
"Peace time has begun in
Darfur. A peace that will be protected by development, not by force," said
Qatari Prime Minister Hamad Bin Jassim Al Thani, at the opening of the
conference.
Specifics of the strategy were presented
by technical specialists, who deemed it vital to adopt a holistic approach in
order to move Darfur out of the cycle of conflict and poverty, and towards a
stable and prosperous future.
Built around the three central
‘pillars’ of Economic Recovery ,
Rehabilitation and Governance and
Justice and Reconciliation, the DDS asserts that Darfuri national and
international supporters must coordinate their efforts to ensure that the
pattern of assistance to Darfur evolves to meet sustainable goals.
A question arises however as to how these funds can be spent
on development in such circumstances of insecurity in the region, where armed
movements have resumed their activity, especially in the heavily populated
state of South Darfur. This is particularly unfortunate since Darfuri displaced
populations collectively agreed, during the “Voluntary Return Conference” held
recently in Nyala, on the urgent need for disarmament as the first prerequisite
for security in the region.
What makes the question even more
pressing is a statement attributed to the conference organizers which says:
“Given Darfur’s prolonged insecurity, the majority of international assistance
to Darfur over the last ten years has quite understandably aimed to support and
sustain displaced populations. Yet this protracted relief aid has done little
to address the root causes of the crisis, nor has it enabled the people of
Darfur and their government to more meaningfully dictate their own recovery and
rehabilitation”.
The statement goes on to accurately explain that “Donor support to
recovery and development based on the needs articulated in the DDS is therefore
required to accelerate implementation of the DDPD and mitigate the risks that
inaction would inevitably bring. In order to ensure a sound investment, the DDS
has incorporated lessons learnt from prior assessments and other international
funding appeals; ones that have been hindered by either a lack of security
and/or funding”.
Therefore, we advise that the money
raised by this conference be reserved until such a time that a final peace
agreement is reached with all the Darfuri armed movements.
Spending the funds which belong to
the people of Darfur and which will prove difficult if not impossible to come
by again, under current conditions, would be much like the Sudanese adage “plowing
water in the sea”!
No comments:
Post a Comment